![]() First Circuit: Um, sure seems like agreeing "to be fully responsible for every aspect of their son's life for the next five to six years" counts as providing value in exchange for that car. It's not like she provided valuable consideration in exchange for that car. And for good measure, the SEC also sues Woman to disgorge the $134.5k Man spent buying her the car. ![]() Years later, Man is sued by the SEC for securities fraud. Man agrees to pay child support and buy a new car for Woman every three years until their child turns nineteen. The Massachusetts common-law question we have instead is whether there's a cause of action to remedy this judicial bait-and-switch.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |